USPTO serial 75716408
SIMULA SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMULA SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth Miller Roesel
ELIZABETH MILLER ROESEL SHAWPITTMAN2300 N ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SHOCK-ABSORBING AND CRASH-RESISTANT SEATS FOR AIRCRAFT; FIBERGLASS, CUSHIONED, UPHOLSTERED, RECLINING AND SLEEPING SEATS FOR USE IN RAIL CARS, RAIL LOCOMOTIVE CABS, BUSES, MILITARY VEHICLES AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT VEHICLES IN THE NATURE OF EXCAVATORS, BACKHOES, BULLDOZERS, ROLLERS, GRADERS, FORKLIFTS AND FRONT-END LOADERS; OVERHEAD STORAGE BINS FOR AIRCRAFT; SEAT BACK ASSEMBLIES AND FRAMES FOR AIRCRAFT AND GROUND TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES; WINDOWS, CANOPIES AND WINDSHIELDS FOR AIRCRAFT; GLASS WINDOWS FOR AUTOMOBILES AND RAILROAD TRAINS; INFLATABLE RESTRAINTS IN THE NATURE OF AIRBAGS AND TUBULAR VEHICLE RESTRAINTS FOR USE IN AIRCRAFT, BOATS, AUTOMOBILES, VANS, TRUCKS, SPORT-UTILITY VEHICLES AND MILITARY VEHICLES; FINISHED GLASS WINDOWS FOR AUTOMOBILES; PARACHUTES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |