Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 75716500?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/75716500. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns VIRTUAL CELL?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 75716500, the listed owner(s) include: Alliant Techsystems Inc., Alliant Techsystems Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 75716500?

Serial number 75716500 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark VIRTUAL CELL. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover VIRTUAL CELL?

The public record lists International Classes: 009. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 75716500

VIRTUAL CELL

Q: What is the current status of VIRTUAL CELL?

VIRTUAL CELL (75716500) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: May 27, 1999
Status date: Jan 15, 2004
Registration date: —
Examiner: WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Hopkins, MN
Other trademarks owned by Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Alliant Techsystems Inc.
Hopkins, MN
Other trademarks owned by Alliant Techsystems Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Arrett

RICHARD A ARRETT VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, PASTE 20006109 BLUE CIR DRMINNETONKA, MN 55343-9131

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	BATTERIES, AND IN PARTICULAR CUSTOM DESIGNED BATTERIES	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 14, 2015	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Mar 23, 2004	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2003	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Jun 16, 2003	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Jun 16, 2003	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Aug 1, 2002	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jul 30, 2002	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Jul 16, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 13, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2001	REIN	REINSTATED	—
Feb 12, 2001	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2000	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 23, 2000	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2000	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 8, 1999	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1999	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—