Drawing for WEBSTATION2000

USPTO serial 75718205

WEBSTATION2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBSTATION2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janine S. Benton

Janine S Benton Benton Potter & Murdock, PC400 South Maple AvenueSuite 210Falls Church, VA 22046

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and peripherals for use in biometric recognition, identification and authentication, computer hardware and peripherals, namely, virtual machines with computer operating systems, personal computer controller cards that allows users to activate switching between the virtual machines; computer network equipment, namely, hubs, switches and routers, used to separate a single computer workstation into physical and logical environments to assure separation of internal and external networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 14, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 12, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance