USPTO serial 75718689
THE BEST PRESENT COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BEST PRESENT COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Delivery of gifts, namely, delivery of pre-paid debit cards, gift cards, gift certificates and greeting cards | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Present Company, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Best Present Company, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named THE BEST PRESENT COMPANY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |