USPTO serial 75719648
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH-5036 Oberentfelden, CH
CH-5036 Oberentfelden, CH
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, boots and shoes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |