USPTO serial 75719651
MAYDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAYDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic transceivers for vehicles for requesting emergency police, fire, and rescue service, emergency road service, and for requesting and receiving travel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |