Drawing for SOLDER BALL INTERPOSER

USPTO serial 75719678

SOLDER BALL INTERPOSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALL, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLDER BALL INTERPOSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Substrates for semi-conductors; glazed substrates for thermal printer heads; polyimide thin film multilayer substrates for semi-conductors; integrated circuit packages for semi-conductors; chip packages; crystal resonator SAW(Surface Acoustic Wave) filter package; leadless chip carriers; interposers for semi-conductors; printed circuit boards; flexible printed circuit boards; printed wiring boards; pin grid arrays chip packages; ball grid array chip packages; aluminum nitride products and cerdips, namely, ceramic packages or substrates used in the manufacture of integrated circuits; printed circuits; printed wiring; multilayer printed circuit boardACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 4, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 20, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 3, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 13, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 5, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance