USPTO serial 75719899
BIGCAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2002
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIGCAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3E4, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3E4, CA
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3E4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA900 SECOND AVE SSUITE 820MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3813Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | portable mixing devices, namely cement mixers, mortar mixers and stucco mixers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |