USPTO serial 75721484
EQUITY BUILDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EQUITY BUILDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ethan D. Civan
ETHAN D CIVAN170 SOMERSET DRBLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCING SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCING BURGLAR AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |