USPTO serial 75722993
E-MANUFACTURING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-MANUFACTURING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines in the nature of rapid prototyping apparatus for making parts, prototypes, models, molds, tooling and other kinds of three-dimensional objects from plastic, metal, ceramic, sand-based composite or multiple materials for industrial machine parts, automotive parts, aviation, space technology, consumer goods, electrical and electronic components, scientific and artistic design or representations, architecture, jewelry, human skeletal components and other kinds of three-dimensional objects | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | optical apparatus and instruments, namely, lasers, deflection mirrors, beam expanders, scanners, plane field lenses and shutters for use in rapid prototyping and manufacturing apparatus and systems, in particular, laser sintering apparatus; data processing equipment, namely, laser sintering apparatus; and computer programs for use in rapid prototyping and manufacturing apparatus and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training services, namely, providing an engineer to introduce and explain the properties, features and operating of rapid prototyping apparatus, in particular, laser sintering apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services for others, namely providing engineering and consulting services relating to the manufacture of prototypes, models, molds and parts for others by rapid prototyping processes; computer programming services for others, namely, programming for rapid prototyping apparatus and systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |