USPTO serial 75723071
HDL EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HDL EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely, high capacity HDL, or hardware description language, source code transformation software which translates models developed using a particular hardware description language into another model in a different description language | ACTIVE | Apr 17, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |