USPTO serial 75723127
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Landmann Wire Rope Products, Inc.
South San Francisco, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Wire Rope | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |