USPTO serial 75723138
MODART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Solana Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | works of art and pictorial art prints, namely, paintings, portraits, drawings, sketches, murals, graphic art prints, printed art representations and reproductions, lithographs and lithographic prints, mounted and unmounted posters, and books featuring visual art, sculpture, painting, art prints, graphic prints, representations and reproductions; books and informational brochures featuring drawings, namely, sketches, art reproductions drawings, and graphic prints; paintings and photographic reproductions on post cards, greeting cards, all occasion cards, calendars, daily planners, stationery, note pads, paperboard and diaries | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |