USPTO serial 75723575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN DIEGO, CA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
IRVING, TX
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ computer software for tracking and analyzing scheduling data, such as time, status and location information, for meeting consolidation and planning; computer software for meeting and event planning and purchasing, namely, tracking and leveraging of supplier utilization and supplier purchasing; database management software for tracking individual event logistics and inventories, tracking of data related to individual event participant registration services, tracking of individual event participant information, requests and requirements; database management software for estimating, identifying and documenting expenses associated with a meeting or event, estimating, identifying and documenting individual participant expenses associated with attending a meeting or event, preparing event budgets, preparing proposal requests based on decision-support supplier data, documenting cost avoidance measurements on an item by item basis within expense lines of meeting and event budgets, documentation of meeting and event spends by sponsor, department, division, product group and company, post event supplier invoice auditing, and billing reconciliation; and training and technical manuals sold as a unit ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 035 | providing a web site of business information, including descriptions of the products and services of others and bench mark data in the fields of meeting consolidation and planning and event planning via a global computer network; advertising services, namely providing advertising space on a web site to promote the products and services of others via a global computer network; on-line business consultation services in the fields of meeting consolidation and planning, event planning, supplier opportunity brokering, international event resource, event program development, meeting registration services, venue researching, negotiating and contracting services | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 042 | computer consulting services, namely, local computer network page development for others | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 22, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |