USPTO serial 75723797
ALKARTNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALKARTNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Numerically controlled lathes, numerically controlled grinding machines, numerically controlled milling machines, machining centers and turning centers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Computer software for use in the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair of machine tools and numerically controlled machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of machine tools and numerically controlled machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer diagnostic services; providing a database of information featuring general information regarding computer control of machining operations of numerically controlled machine tools; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; remote monitoring of computer systems, remote diagnosis of computer systems, all relating to machining operations of numerically controlled machine tools; rental of computer software concerning machining operations; computer services, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in the maintenance, diagnosis and repair of machine tools and numerically controlled machines; computer services, namely providing information via global computer networks regarding computer software for use in the maintenance, diagnosis and repair of machine tools and numerically controlled machines; computer services, namely providing a database of information on the machining operations of machine tools and numerically controlled machine tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Citizen Tokei Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Citizen Tokei Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALKARTNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |