Drawing for DESCO DESIGN COMPANY

USPTO serial 75724200

DESCO DESIGN COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESCO DESIGN COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bathroom accessories, namely, soap boxes, tooth brush holders, insulating jars to hold cotton balls and cotton swabs; food-container sets; salt shakers; pepper shakers; napkin-holders; salad bowls; all purpose portable household containers for spices and salad dressing; sugar bowls; spoons for serving rice; salad tongs; insulating jars to hold juice; wine and water glasses; grated cheese containers; dishes and bowls; bottle cradles for wine; paper towel holders; containers for foods, namely, candy, and desserts; meal trays; meal trays with divisions; serving trays with divisions; dish drainers; cutlery holders; cheese plates; pie dishes; cups and saucers; salad dishes with divisions; cork-screws; cutlery drainers; pasta colanders for household use; orange squeezers; cutlery holders for drawers; funnels; butter dishes; and milk jugs, all of which are made of plasticACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 8, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 6, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance