Drawing for PROWL

USPTO serial 75725609

PROWL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROWL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, games and sporting goods, namely basketballs, golf balls, playground balls, sports balls, rubber action balls and foam action balls, basketball nets, basketball backboards, pumps for inflating basketballs, and needles therefor, golf clubs, golf bags, golf putters, golf ball gift sets comprised of one or more of the following-- divot repair tools, tees and ball markers, golf accessories, namely golf bag covers, club head covers, golf bag den caddy in the nature of a non-motorized golf cart, golf gloves, golf ball sleeves, bicycle tags, electronic basketball table top games, basketball table top games, basketball board games, electronic video arcade game machines, basketball kit comprised of a basketball net and whistle, and Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 24, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance