USPTO serial 75725698
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ATLANTA, GA
SAN MATEO, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
San Mateo, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely providing consultation services in the field of supply chain management for the automotive industry and for suppliers to the automotive industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | providing consultation services for the design and development of information systems for businesses in the automotive industry, for suppliers to the automotive industry and computer consultation for the design and development of information systems for businesses in the automotive industry and for suppliers of the automotive industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |