USPTO serial 75725704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ONTARIO L4B 3G4, CA
ONTARIO L4B 3G4, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed great northern beans, processed mung beans, processed garbanzo beans, processed red lentils, processed green lentils, processed black eye peas, processed yellow split peas, quince preserve, rose petal jam, sour cherry preserve, carrot preserve, fig preserve, 3 fruit jam, cucumbers pickled, shallots pickled, mixed vegetables pickled, egg plants pickled, pomegranate paste, tamarind paste, sabzi ghormah (dehydrated dried vegetables), sabzi polo (dehydrated dried vegetables), subzi kookoo (dehydrated dried vegetables), sabzi aash (dehydrated dried vegetables); noodle veggie soup, barley and 7 spice soup, golden prunes, sour cherry dried, processed mulberries, processed barberry | ABANDONED | Mar 5, 1993 |
| 030 | Barley, soft wheat kernel, dry vermicelli, roasted vermecelli, turmeric, spice for rice, BBQ power, black pepper, white pepper, cardamom green, cayenne pepper, cloves, coriander, curry powder, fish powder, garlic granulated, marjoram ground, kabob seasoning, saffron; black caraway seed, shallots and barberry for use as seasonings; sour cherry syrup, quince syrup, orange blossom syrup, rose syrup, lemon syrup, pomegranate molasses, grape molasses, date molasses; seasonings, namely dillweed, fenugreek, savory leaves, mint cut, cilantro leaves, basil leaves, leeks, spinach flakes, and tarragon leaves, wheat flour, rice, flour, chick pea flour, baking powder, pure honey, pure honey with comb, pure light honey, white basmati rice, and Thai jasmine rice | ABANDONED | Mar 5, 1993 |
| 032 | Rose water, mint water, willow water, tarooneh water, kashni water, shahtareh water, sour grape juice, pomegrante juice, lime juice, lemon juice, mango juice, tamarind juice, apricot juice | ABANDONED | Mar 5, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |