USPTO serial 75725742
TEARX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEARX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kodiak, AK
Kodiak, AK
Kodiak, AK
Kodiak, AK
Kodiak, AK
Kodiak, AK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Herb, vegetable and fruit teas | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sage Group International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bizness Results, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marion Allen Stirrup
- Other trademarks owned by Sage Group International LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bizness Results, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marion Allen Stirrup
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TEARX
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |