USPTO serial 75725813
WEB WORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEB WORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in database management; computer software for word processing; computer software for use as a spreadsheet; interactive multimedia computer programs for managing databases, word processing, use as a spreadsheet, educational training, conducting research, data warehousing, and software development; computer software for educational training; electronic databases recorded on computer media, all in the fields of sales and marketing; computer software that enables users to log customer calls and assign problems; computer software programs that provide caller profiles and symptom analysis and problem solution assistance in the field of customer relationship management, sales force automation, and task organization for use by businesses in marketing and sales activities, and in customer services and support and help desk applications; computer software to automate data warehousing; computer software development tools; and computer software for operating systems | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |