Drawing for SMART SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75726006

SMART SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Mulcahy

ROBERT W MULCAHY ATTORNEY AT LAWAPPLIED MATERIALS, INC2881 SCOTT BLVD M/S 2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95054

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Semiconductor wafer processing equipment, and components, namely; epitaxial reactors; chemical vapor deposition reactors; physical vapor deposition reactors; plasma etchers; ion implanters; supporting frames therefor, chemical mechanical polishers; semiconductor wafer process and diagnostic and control equipment; and computer operated programs for use therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 14, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 13, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 13, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 26, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance