USPTO serial 75726006
SMART SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Mulcahy
ROBERT W MULCAHY ATTORNEY AT LAWAPPLIED MATERIALS, INC2881 SCOTT BLVD M/S 2061SANTA CLARA, CA 95054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor wafer processing equipment, and components, namely; epitaxial reactors; chemical vapor deposition reactors; physical vapor deposition reactors; plasma etchers; ion implanters; supporting frames therefor, chemical mechanical polishers; semiconductor wafer process and diagnostic and control equipment; and computer operated programs for use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |