USPTO serial 75726124
MAESTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAESTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BETHESDA, MD
CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION
ST. PETERSBURG, FL
Mountain View, CA
BETHESDA, MD
BETHESDA, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP2300 N Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing marketing information via the internet, excluding financial and payment information; promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount coupons, rebate certificates, rebate rewards, gift certificates, free samples, sales notifications; promoting the goods and services of others through the administration of loyalty discount programs and incentive award programs; conducting business and market research surveys; dissemination of advertising for others via online electronic communications networks; developing and managing advertising and promotional campaigns for businesses; conducting marketing campaigns directed or targeted towards selected users of computer and communications networks; business marketing consulting services; conducting market research for others concerning shopping and behavior trends of users of computer and communication networks; conducting market research, analysis, and consulting services for others, namely, tracking, analyzing, and reporting responses to advertising, incentives and promotional offers disseminated via computer and communication networks; providing business marketing consultation in the field of customer brand loyalty, advertising, incentives and promotional campaigns; processing, analyzing, and reporting consumer data in the field of consumer demographics, purchasing trends, and consumer responses to promotional materials, programs, and campaigns, excluding financial and payment data; and processing, analyzing, and reporting business, and market data, excluding financial and payment data | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of messages, data, and documents, excluding financial and payment messages, data, and documents, via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing websites for others; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; technical consultation in the field of websites and electronic commerce; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in designing coupons and promotional campaigns, and for managing and tracking the effectiveness of promotional campaigns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E-CENTIVES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CATALINA MARKETING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BrightStreet.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INVENDA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by E-CENTIVES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAESTRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |