Drawing for LUAU LOUNGE

USPTO serial 75726867

LUAU LOUNGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUAU LOUNGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing namely, tops, t-shirts, bottoms, dresses, shorts, pants, pajamas, sleepwear, jackets, overcoats, raincoats, raincoats, sweatshirts, and robesACTIVEMay 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 2, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2002REINREINSTATED
Feb 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Oct 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance