Drawing for JUNKER GROUP

USPTO serial 75727081

JUNKER GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUNKER GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE TOOLS AND WORK PIECE MACHINING EQUIPMENT AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, CNC O.D. GRINDING MACHINES, CRANKSHAFT GRINDING MACHINES, VALVE GRINDING MACHINES, FLUTE GRINDING MACHINES, CUSTOM GRINDING MACHINES, CUTTING TOOL GRINDING MACHINES, CUTTING TOOL SHARPENING MACHINES, STRAIGHTENING MACHINES, O.D. GRINDING MACHINES, O.D. AND INTERNAL CIRCULAR GRINDING MACHINES, INTERNAL CIRCULAR GRINDING MACHINES, SURFACE AND INTERNAL CIRCULAR GRINDING MACHINES, FACE AND I.D GRINDING MACHINES, SLOT GRINDING MACHINES, CENTERLESS CYLINDRICAL GRINDING MACHINES, HORIZONTAL SURFACE GRINDING MACHINES, DOUBLE DISC FACE GRINDING MACHINES, TURNING MACHINES, MILLING MACHINES, HARD TURNING MACHINES, STRAIGHTENING MACHINES FOR STRAIGHTENING ROTATIONALLY SYMMETRICAL PARTS, SOURCE EXTRACTION MACHINES, CENTRAL EXTRACTION MACHINES, ENGRAVING MACHINES, AND BRUSHING MACHINES; GRINDING MACHINES, GRINDING MACHINES FOR MANUFACTURE OF TWIST DRILLS; THREADING MACHINES; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, CNC CONTROLLED WHEEL TRUEING ATTACHMENT WITH 3 CNC-AXES AND WITH DRIVEN OR STATIONARY TRUEING ELEMENTS FOR TRIMMING GRINDING WHEELS AND PARTS THEREOF; METAL CUTTING MACHINES; AND TRUEING MACHINESACTIVE
009DATA PROCESSING PROGRAMS FOR CONTROLLING METAL-WORKING MACHINESACTIVE
042COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF CONTROLLING METAL-WORKING MACHINESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 9, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 21, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 25, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 27, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance