USPTO serial 75727299
FM FASKEN MARTINEAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FM FASKEN MARTINEAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5K 1N6, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network with an emphasis on legal services and legal education | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services provided over local area networks, wide area networks, and global computer networks, namely, providing classes and instruction in the field of law and computer software training | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | legal services; providing advice in the field of law; patent agency services; legal services with regard to patents and trademarks; providing legal information; and providing legal services by means of local area networks, wide area networks, and Global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |