USPTO serial 75727622
BUSINESSCARDSQUICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSINESSCARDSQUICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carlsbad, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and computer programs downloadable from a global computer information network used to print information and form documents available through the use of a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Mar 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |