USPTO serial 75729782
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID SPAW
DAVID SPAW RANKIN, HILL, PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1405UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | building lumber; portable and pre-fabricated non-metal buildings; lumber in the nature of formed, pressed and partially pressed wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction planning | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | cutting of wood to the specification of others; providing information on the processing of materials, namely, wood and metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consultation on processing of materials, namely, wood and metal; product development; engineering; computer consultation; research in the field of mechanical engineering; material testing; leasing of computer software; all in the fields of automotive manufacture, automotive marketing, wood and metal processing machines, fastening techniques for wood and other nonmetallic materials, nonmetal mountings, wood and metal fabrication machines, plastics technology, structural engineering, wooden construction, furniture construction, interior design, and interior construction | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |