Drawing for WOODWELDING

USPTO serial 75729782

WOODWELDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOODWELDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID SPAW

DAVID SPAW RANKIN, HILL, PORTER & CLARK LLP925 EUCLID AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44115-1405UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019building lumber; portable and pre-fabricated non-metal buildings; lumber in the nature of formed, pressed and partially pressed woodACTIVE
037construction planningACTIVE
040cutting of wood to the specification of others; providing information on the processing of materials, namely, wood and metalACTIVE
042consultation on processing of materials, namely, wood and metal; product development; engineering; computer consultation; research in the field of mechanical engineering; material testing; leasing of computer software; all in the fields of automotive manufacture, automotive marketing, wood and metal processing machines, fastening techniques for wood and other nonmetallic materials, nonmetal mountings, wood and metal fabrication machines, plastics technology, structural engineering, wooden construction, furniture construction, interior design, and interior constructionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 30, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 16, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 16, 2003EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART
Mar 24, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 6, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 31, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 29, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 22, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 21, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance