USPTO serial 75731072
INOBYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INOBYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PLEASANTON, CA
PLEASANTON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH A. BARRITT
KEITH BARRITT FISH & RICHARDSON PC1425 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED ANIMAL FEED | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES, AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES AVAILABLE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, IN THE FIELDS OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND MEDICATED ANIMAL FEED | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS, INCLUDING DISSEMINATION ON-LINE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND VIA DIGITAL AUDIO, DIGITAL VIDEO, AND DIGITAL DATA, FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS AND MEDICATED ANIMAL FEED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INOBYS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by INOBYS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INOBYS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |