USPTO serial 75732363
ESALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENNINGS, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Kimbell
DANIEL R KIMBELL CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING BEAUTY AND PERSONAL CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE CLASSES, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BEAUTY AND PERSONAL CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING BEAUTY AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; PROVIDING ON-LINE CONSULTATION IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, MARKETING AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS TO PROVIDERS OF BEAUTY AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; AND PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION CONCERNING INDUSTRY EVENTS IN THE BEAUTY AND PERSONAL CARE FIELD | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |