USPTO serial 75732905
TESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3005270Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 11, 2005
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. T. Giordano
V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MACHINE-READABLE SOUND, IMAGE AND DATA CARRIERS OF ALL KINDS, NAMELY BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER CARDS IN THE FORM OF WOUND TAPES FOR OPTICAL, NON-MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE AND NON-ROTATING FLAT DATA CARRIERS; COMPUTER DRIVES AND CHANGES DRIVES, NAMELY DRIVES FOR WOUND TAPES THAT CAN BE IMPRINTED AND READ WITHOUT BEING UNWOUND AND THAT ARE USED FOR NON-MAGNETIC DATA STORAGE AND NON-ROTATING FLAT DATA CARRIERS; MICROCODES, NAMELY SMALL INFORMATION CARRYING SECTIONS WITHIN POLYMERIC MATERIAL, COMPRISING HOLOGRAPHIC AND NON-HOLOGRAPHIC MICROCODES, FOR LABELLING OBJECTS AND THE CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 4, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |