USPTO serial 75737026
RESTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Kera
DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYFOURTH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | SECURITIES BROKERAGE, SECURITIES TRADING, AND SECURITIES UNDERWRITING SERVICES; SERVING AS A PRIVATE PLACEMENT AGENT FOR SECURITIES; INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |