Drawing for CLEAR-PACKET TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75738056

CLEAR-PACKET TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2833372Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 13, 2004
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CLEAR-PACKET TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communications network services, namely, a feature of electronic transmission services of voice, data, video and imagesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Apr 13, 2004R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 7, 2004CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Dec 30, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 26, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance