USPTO serial 75738505
NANOSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2946301Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2005
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Romeoville, IL
Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Romeoville, IL
Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Romeoville, IL
Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Nanocrystalline material in the nature of a coating to providing electrical conductivity, abrasion resistance, ultraviolet protection and corrosion resistance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named NANOSHIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |