USPTO serial 75738726
DRI-DOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRI-DOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Culver
MICHAEL S CULVER OLIFF & BERRIDGE PLCP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FABRIC FOR USE IN THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNIFORMS, JACKETS, PANTS, JOGGING SUITS AND VESTS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING SOLD TO GOVERNMENT FOR USE IN THE MILITARY | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | FABRICS SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF COMPLETED CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNIFORMS, JACKETS, PANTS, JOGGING SUITS AND VESTS, ALL OF THE FOREGOING SOLD TO GOVERNMENT FOR USE IN THE MILITARY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Power Source, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Power Source, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DRI-DOC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |