USPTO serial 75738810
INNER-CITY GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNER-CITY GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, Jerseys, Sweatshirts, Sweatpants, Jackets, Shirts, Jeans, Caps, Headbands, Visors, Hats, Wristbands, Socks, Belts, Undergarments, Sport shirts, Knit shirts, Sweaters, Shorts, Tanktops and Sandals | ACTIVE | Aug 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |