USPTO serial 75739287
O'BRODYS IRISH SANDWICH BARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O'BRODYS IRISH SANDWICH BARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services featuring sandwiches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Briens Irish Sandwich Bars Limited
- Other trademarks owned by O'Briens Irish Sandwich Bars Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named O'BRODYS IRISH SANDWICH BARS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |