USPTO serial 75739768
ITRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-80802 Munchen, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER SERVICES; CREDIT INQUIRY AND CONSULTATION SERVICES; INSURANCE CONSULTATION SERVICES; FINANCIAL GUARANTEE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | DELIVERY OF MESSAGES VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | TRANSPORTATION RESERVATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TESTING, ANALYSIS, AND EVALUATION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS FOR CERTIFICATION, PROVIDING INFORMATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO BUYERS AND SELLERS FOR TRADING GOODS AND SERVICES BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING INFORMATION SERVICES AND SOFTWARE TO ENABLE SELLERS AND BUYERS TO EXCHANGE GOODS AND SERVICES OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, INCLUDING DYNAMIC TRADING MECHANISMS, SUCH AS AUCTIONS, RFQ'S (REQUESTS FOR QUOTES), RFP'S (REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS) OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF DYNAMIC PRICING; TRADING TRANSACTION ROUTING, MULTIPLE PROTOCOL SUPPORT FOR EXCHANGING CONTENT AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION, AND CONVERTING A TRADE INTO THE SUPPLIER'S PREFERRED TRANSACTION PROTOCOL; CATALOG MAINTENANCE SERVICE TO BUYERS AND SELLERS, DESIGN OF WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; WEB HOSTING SERVICES; LEASING OUT OF COMPUTER FACILITATES; COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, CONSULTING FOR OPERATING ELECTRONIC EXCHANGES AND SECURE TRANSACTIONS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND SERVICES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |