Drawing for VALIFY

USPTO serial 75740292

VALIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATION, ISSUANCE AND VERIFICATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES, ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGES, FOR MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER ACCESS RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS, FOR STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE VALIDITY OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS, AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTATION SOLD AS A UNIT, ALL FOR NETWORK SECURITY AND AUTHENTICATION FOR ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND FOR APPLICATION TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE
039ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC NETWORK SECURITY, INCLUDING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE VALIDITY OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONSACTIVE
042PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC NETWORK SECURITY; PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES ON ISSUANCE AND VERIFICATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES AND ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND OTHER COMPUTER ACCESS RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORK, INCLUDING PROVIDING PROOF OR ASSURANCE THAT AN ELECTRONIC CREDENTIAL OR MESSAGE IS VALID; DESIGN AND OPERATION FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT ISSUANCE AND VALIDATION OF ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND MESSAGES; CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION FOR OTHERS OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PERTAINING TO ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS; CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS BY PROVIDING ON-LINE ASSISTANCE BY MEANS OF THE GLOBAL COMPUTING INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 7, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 7, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 15, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance