USPTO serial 75740292
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATION, ISSUANCE AND VERIFICATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES, ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGES, FOR MANAGEMENT OF COMPUTER ACCESS RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS, FOR STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE VALIDITY OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS, AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTATION SOLD AS A UNIT, ALL FOR NETWORK SECURITY AND AUTHENTICATION FOR ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND FOR APPLICATION TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC NETWORK SECURITY, INCLUDING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE VALIDITY OF DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC NETWORK SECURITY; PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION SERVICES ON ISSUANCE AND VERIFICATION OF DIGITAL SIGNATURES AND ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND OTHER COMPUTER ACCESS RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORK, INCLUDING PROVIDING PROOF OR ASSURANCE THAT AN ELECTRONIC CREDENTIAL OR MESSAGE IS VALID; DESIGN AND OPERATION FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT ISSUANCE AND VALIDATION OF ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS AND MESSAGES; CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION FOR OTHERS OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PERTAINING TO ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS; CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE USE OF ELECTRONIC CREDENTIALS BY PROVIDING ON-LINE ASSISTANCE BY MEANS OF THE GLOBAL COMPUTING INFORMATION NETWORK OR OTHER COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |