USPTO serial 75740823
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Interoute Telecommunications Plc
London WIN 3AA, GB
1-21 FUTURE COMMUNICATION LIMITED
LONDON, GB
Interoute Telecommunications Plc
London WIN 3AA, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Upton Douglass
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications installations, namely, telephones and telephone transmitters; fiber-optic telecommunications and communications networks comprised of telephones, computer hardware, and telephone transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and maintenance of telecommunications networks; providing information related to the installation, repair and maintenance of telecommunications networks; installation, maintenance, and repair of telecommunications, communications, and data transmission networks, namely, electronic data transmission networks, and other networks for transmission of voice, text, facsimile, video and audio data; maintenance of computer systems comprised of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consultation, telecommunications gateway services, telecommunications reseller services, namely, providing long distance telecommunication services, telecommunications routing and junction services, ISDN services, personal communications services, and providing fiber optic networks; telecommunications services, namely, providing multiple-user access to a worldwide telecommunications network and the Internet, providing managed transmission of data based upon speed and range of frequencies that an electronic signal occupies based on synchronous data transmission on optical media to users of telecommunication networks; electronic transmission of data via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hosting the web sites of others on the Internet; monitoring the computer systems of others and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; maintenance of computer systems comprised of computer software; hosting communications networks, namely, hosting digital content on the Internet, and application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; monitoring telecommunication, communication, and data transmission networks, namely, electronic data transmission networks, and other networks for transmission of voice, text, facsimile, video and audio data; and designing telecommunications, communications and data transmissions networks for others, and providing technical assistance in the nature of troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems for telecommunications, communications, and data transmission networks, namely, electronic data transmission networks, and other networks for transmission of voice, text, facsimile, video and audio data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |