USPTO serial 75741066
RTZF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RTZF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Structural parts for vehicles, namely, electromechanical systems for preventing accidents involving vehicles including accidents between two or more vehicles, accidents between a vehicle and an inanimate objects other than another vehicle, accidents between a vehicle and an animate object, accidents in which a vehicle deviates from a roadway, accidents caused by driving and road conditions, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for determining the presence, location and/or velocity of vehicles utilizing radar, lidar, optical and/or infrared imaging, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for determining the position of a vehicle involving vehicular-mounted, satellite-based positioning systems and/or ground-based transmission towers, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical vehicular guidance systems for guiding a vehicle along a roadway, in traffic, out of a traffic stream to a shoulder of the roadway, exit or other location and in accordance with a map, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, data storage devices containing map data, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; automatic vehicular steering systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, actuators, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for determining and absolute and/or relative position of edges and lane boundaries of a roadway such as relative to vehicle, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for determining the position of a vehicle relative to edges and lane boundaries, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for automatically controlling travel of a vehicle on a roadway, namely, automatic cruise control systems for controlling travel of a vehicle on a roadway at a set speed and braking of a vehicle, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, actuators, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for enabling communication between vehicles, primarily of data relating to position of one or more of the vehicles and accuracy thereof and/or velocity of one or more of the vehicles, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology; electromechanical systems for enabling communication between a vehicle and a source of maps and data on weather and road conditions to direct movement of the vehicle and to prevent accidents involving the vehicle, said systems consisting primarily of transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software, a visual display screen or speaker, and electrical architecture all optionally interacting with global positioning system satellite or ground-based technology | ACTIVE | Jul 19, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RTZF
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |