USPTO serial 75744335
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2K6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Infrastructures for Information Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2K6, CA
Other trademarks owned by Infrastructures for Information Inc.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE PROGRAM FOR WORD PROCESSING APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |