USPTO serial 75745371
PACELAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACELAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRYSTE 1200224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Videorecorders, audio transmitters; magnetic data carriers and compact discs prerecorded with computer programs for knowledge based engineering; automatic vending machines and Coin changers; cash registers, calculators, data processors and computers; computer peripherals; computer programs for knowledge based engineering in the field of product life circle management; fire-extinguishers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services namely providing courses and seminars in the field of the application and development of knowledge based engineering and product life circle management software; entertainment in the nature of dance performances; organization of trade fairs and trade exhibitions; entertainment services, namely, organization of meetings and conferences for cultural purposes; providing education in the field of software maintenance and training rendered through correspondence courses; educational courses, namely, instruction via broadcast or television in the field of software maintenance and training; publication of books, journals and magazines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architectural consultation and construction drafting; Resort lodging and boarding house services; Chemist services; engineering services; opticians service; physicist services; language interpreters services; computer programming for others; technical geological surveys; land surveying; missing persons investigations; investigations concerning legal affaires, namely, detective services; portrait photography; technical and legal research concerning the protection of industrial property; technical consultation related to land surveying; language translation; rental of computers and computer software; rental of automatic vending machines; Licensing of intellectual property and patent licensing; material testing; weather forecasting; hotel reservations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |