USPTO serial 75745392
POCKETMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POCKETMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Patrick Suiter
SEAN PATRICK SUITER STE R & ASSOCIATES PC14301 FNB PKWY STE 220OMAHA, NE 68154-5299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer database software for use in the health care filed for recording, accessing and outputting patient medical records and insurance reimbursement codes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |