Drawing for MONITOR ISM

USPTO serial 75745737

MONITOR ISM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2601675Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 30, 2002
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONITOR ISM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLP10th FloorOne Landmark SquareStamford, CT 06901-2682

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer controlled surveillance systems comprising computer based configuration and surveillance station or stations and security controllers with related security surveillance field hardware, for use in providing fire, gas and anti-intrusion alarm surveillance, control of building lighting, central alarm surveillance and access to security systems recordsEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 30, 2008C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 17, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2008E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 10, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 4, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 24, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance