USPTO serial 75745780
LA FEMME VICTORIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERCALDI, ANTHONY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA FEMME VICTORIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal care products, namely, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail stencils, hard artificial nails, shower gel, bubble bath, fragrant body splash, hand lotion, body lotion, face lotion, hand soap, body soap, face soap, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair styling gel, hair spray, hair dyes, hair rinses, perfume, cologne, body glitter, mascara, blush, eye shadow, lip stick, lip gloss, make-up, make-up remover, eyecream, hand cream, body cream, face cream, astringent for cosmetic purposes for the face, face cleanser, bath oil, bath beads, body powder, face powder, talcum powder, non-medicated blemish stick, shaving cream, deodorants for personal use, potpourri, sachets, scented beads, body suntan lotion, face suntan lotion, body sunless tanning lotion, face sunless tanning lotion, body pre-suntanning lotion, face pre-suntanning lotion, body after suntanning lotion and face after suntanning lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |