USPTO serial 75745822
SONOPREP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONOPREP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lewis E. Lamb III, Esq.
LEWIS E LAMB III HUNTON AND WILLIAMS1900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical device for increasing the permeability of a patients skin using ultrasonic energy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |