Drawing for FAIRYLAND

USPTO serial 75745854

FAIRYLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, REID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAIRYLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM E. ALFRED

WILLIAM E ALFRED BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009GAME CARTRIDGES, NAMELY VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; GAME CONTROLLERS, NAMELY COMPUTER JOYSTICKS AND VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS; GAME DISCS, NAMELY VIDEO GAME DISCS AND COMPUTER GAME DISCSACTIVE—
028DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; DOLLS AND PLAYSETS THEREFOR; NURSERY-RHYME DOLLS; DOLL CLOTHING; DOLL COSTUMES; DOLL CASES; DOLL HOUSES AND FURNISHINGS THEREFOR; PLAYHOUSES; TOY FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; TOY FIGURES AND PLAYSETS THEREFOR; TOYS NAMELY PLUSH CHARACTERS; TOY VEHICLES; GAMES, NAMELY CARD GAMES AND BOARD GAMES; EDUCATIONAL BOARD GAMES; GAME MACHINES, NAMELY STAND-ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES AND ELECTRONIC HAND HELD GAME MACHINES; GAME TABLES; AND BOARD GAMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 10, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 1, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance