USPTO serial 75746401
INTELLIGENCE BY QUALCOMM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE BY QUALCOMM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell B. Miller
RUSSELL B MILLER PATENT DEPTQUALCOMM INCORPORATED5775 MOREHOUSE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1714Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless communication apparatus, namely, modems, cellular telephones, wireless local loop telephones and personal communication services (PCS) handsets and manuals and accessories therefor, namely, AC adapters, carry cases and connectors; radio frequency (RF) and intermediate frequency (IF) transceiver circuit assemblies for wireless communication apparatus; analog and digital signal processing circuit assemblies for wireless communication apparatus; computer programs for testing, calibrating and servicing modems, wireless local loop telephones, cellular telephones, personal communication services (PCS) handsets and personal digital assistant (PDA) device processors; integrated circuits, computer hardware and software for signal processing in wireless communication apparatus; integrated circuits and computer hardware for cellular telephones, radiotelephones, and hand held computers; computer software for operating cellular telephones, radiotelephones and hand held computers; computer hardware for cellular telephones and radiotelephones; modems; amplifiers; signal compression and decompression instruments, namely, codecs; voice encoding and decoding apparatus, namely, vocoders; computer software for signal compression and decompression and technical manuals therefor | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |