USPTO serial 75746652
ETHOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHIE, BRANDEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ETHOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Sydney NW 2060, AU
North Sydney NW 2060, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. LaBarge
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL, O'TOOLE, GASKIN, ET ALSTE 6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-4402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for project management, document management and project management systems, namely software for recording project tasks and project resources to produce project management plans and project work breakdown structures, for managing project deliverables and project scope changes, for interfacing project task data stored in a database with critical path scheduling tools, for monitoring project progress and management of project schedule changes, for managing project budgets, project budget variations, project cashflows, and project cost forecasts, for documenting project quality objectives, for scheduling project quality audits and recording project quality audit outcomes, for recording project quality management activity, for assigning project roles and responsibilities, project resource allocation, actual project resource usage, and personnel performance, for managing the procurement of goods and services for projects, for managing contract variations, for facilitating of contract payment processing, for identifying project risk sources, consequences, likelihoods, and impacts, for recording project risk management activity, for defining project communications processes, for creating template-based project documents from data stored in a database, for managing storage and distribution of project documents, for creating project reports from data stored in a database, and for managing the storage and distribution of project reports; and instruction manuals for computer software sold as a kit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |